Mercurial > hg > orthanc-dicomweb
view TODO @ 665:4646d296303e
removed debug message
author | Sebastien Jodogne <s.jodogne@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:26:28 +0200 |
parents | 4fe4279625f8 |
children | 6ae0e07512b8 |
line wrap: on
line source
* upgrade to SDK 1.12.4 to benefit from new logging primitives for plugins * https://orthanc.uclouvain.be/book/plugins/dicomweb.html#retrieving-dicom-resources-from-a-wado-rs-server Retrieve shall return the list of orthanc IDs -> it is not ! * when retrieving frames from Multi-frame instances, we should not transcode the whole instance for each frame !!! For a 90MB instance with 88 frames, OHIF is unusable because of this ! Sample request: curl -H "Accept: multipart/related; type=application/octet-stream" http://localhost:8043/dicom-web/studies/1.2.156.112536.1.2143.25015081191207.14610300430.5/series/1.2.156.112536.1.2143.25015081191207.14610300430.6/instances/1.2.156.112536.1.2143.25015081191207.14610309990.44/frames/3 --output /tmp/out.bin check for these logs: DICOMweb RetrieveFrames: Transcoding instance a7aec17a-e296e51f-2abe8ad8-bc95d57b-4de269d0 to transfer syntax 1.2.840.10008.1.2.1 We should very likely implement a cache in the DicomWEB plugin and make sure that, if 3 clients are requesting the same instance at the same time, we only request one transcoding. No such issue in StoneViewer since Stone downloads the whole file. However, Stone uses 2-3 workers at the same time and the file is read 2-3 times at the same time before it ends up in Orthanc cache -> we should introduce a state "is_being_loaded" in caches and have other consumers wait for it to be available. https://discourse.orthanc-server.org/t/possible-memory-leak-with-multiframe-dicom-orthanc-ohif/3988/12 * Implement capabilities: https://www.dicomstandard.org/using/dicomweb/capabilities/ from https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/orthanc-users/c60227f2-c6da-4fd9-9b03-3ce9bf7d1af5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer * /rendered at study level shall return all instances, not only one (https://groups.google.com/g/orthanc-users/c/uFWanYhV8Fs/m/ezi1iXCXCAAJ) Check /rendered at series level too. * Implement serialization of DicomWeb jobs * Add support for application/zip in /dicom-web/studies/ (aka sup 211: https://www.dicomstandard.org/docs/librariesprovider2/dicomdocuments/news/ftsup/docs/sups/sup211.pdf?sfvrsn=9fe9edae_2) * Support private tags in search fields: https://discourse.orthanc-server.org/t/dicomweb-plugin-exception-of-unknown-dicom-tag-for-private-data-element-tags-while-using-query-parameters/3998 * Based on this discussion: https://discourse.orthanc-server.org/t/series-metadata-retrieval-is-very-long-even-with-configuration-optimization/3389 optimize studies/.../series/.../metadata route when "SeriesMetadata" is set to "MainDicomTags" and "ExtraMainDicomTags" are configured according to recommandation (from this setup: https://bitbucket.org/osimis/orthanc-setup-samples/src/master/docker/stone-viewer/docker-compose.yml). with a 600 instance series with SQLite - all timings are performed without verbose logs !!!!: - time curl http://localhost:8043/dicom-web/studies/1.2.276.0.7230010.3.1.2.1215942821.4756.1664826045.3529/series/1.2.276.0.7230010.3.1.3.1215942821.4756.1664833048.11984/metadata > /dev/null -> 883ms in Full mode -> 565ms in MainDicomTags mode -> 545ms in Full mode with 1 worker -> 335ms in Full mode with 2 workers -> 267ms in Full mode with 3 workers -> 270ms in Full mode with 4 workers -> 270ms in Full mode with 8 workers - note that all measurements have been performed on a DB with a single series ! We should repeat that with a more realistic DB with a 3 series study (11 + 1233 + 598 instances) time curl http://localhost:8043/dicom-web/studies/1.2.276.0.7230010.3.1.2.1215942821.4756.1664826045.3529/metadata > /dev/null -> 1.355ms in Full mode before using worker threads -> 700ms in Full mode with 4 workers