Mercurial > hg > orthanc-book
view Sphinx/source/faq/scalability.rst @ 337:85524c571277
rephrased Osimis viewer usage according to VCA suggestions
author | Alain Mazy <alain@mazy.be> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:45:51 +0100 |
parents | 83d822f11e78 |
children | a5f7fc9fb611 |
line wrap: on
line source
.. _scalability: Scalability of Orthanc ====================== One of the most common question about Orthanc is: *"How many DICOM instances can be stored by Orthanc?"* The source code of Orthanc imposes no such hard limit by itself. At the time of writing, we know that Orthanc is being used in production in hospitals with more than 15TB of data, 125,000 studies and around 50 millions of instances (please `get in touch with us <https://www.orthanc-server.com/static.php?page=contact>`__ if you can share other testimonials). Other users have even reported more than 28TB of data. Here are links to some testimonials that were published on the `Orthanc Users <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/orthanc-users>`__ discussion group: `1 <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/orthanc-users/-L0D1c2y6rw/KmWnwEijAgAJ>`__, `2 <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/orthanc-users/-L0D1c2y6rw/nLXxtYzuCQAJ>`__, `3 <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/orthanc-users/s5-XlgA2BEY/ZpYagqBwAAAJ>`__, `4 <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/orthanc-users/A4hPaJo439s/NwR6zk9FCgAJ>`__, `5 <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/orthanc-users/Z5cLwbVgJc0/SxVzxF7ABgAJ>`__, `6 <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/orthanc-users/6tGNOqlUk-Q/vppkAYnFAQAJ>`__... The stress is actually put on the underlying database engine, and on the storage area (check out :ref:`orthanc-storage`). As explained in the :ref:`troubleshooting section <troubleshooting>`, the built-in SQLite database engine should be replaced by an enterprise-ready database engine once Orthanc must store several hundreds of thousands of DICOM instances (check out the :ref:`postgresql` and :ref:`mysql`). It is also true that the performance of Orthanc in the presence of large databases has continuously improved over time, especially when it comes to the speed of :ref:`DICOM C-FIND <dicom-find>`. Here is a generic setup that should provide best performance in the presence of large databases: * Make sure to use the latest release of Orthanc (1.5.8 at the time of writing). * We suggest to use the latest release of the :ref:`PostgreSQL plugin <postgresql>` to store the database index (3.2 at the time of writing). Make sure that ``EnableIndex`` is set to ``true``. * Make sure that :ref:`run-time debug assertions <troubleshooting>` are turned off. A warning will show in the logs if this is not the case. Note that all pre-built binaries provided by Osimis are correctly configured in that respect. * We suggest to use the default filesystem storage area. Of course, make sure that the filesystem is properly backed up, and that technologies such as RAID are enabled. Make sure that the option ``EnableStorage`` of the PostgreSQL plugins is set to ``false``. * Obviously, the PostgreSQL database should be stored on a high-speed drive (SSD). This is less important for the storage area. * It may be useful to store the PostgreSQL database on another drive than the storage area. This should improve the use of the available bandwidth to the disks. * The :ref:`Orthanc configuration file <configuration>` should have the following values for performance-related options (but make sure to understand their implications): * ``StorageCompression = false`` * ``LimitFindResults = 100`` * ``LimitFindInstances = 100`` * ``KeepAlive = true`` * ``TcpNoDelay = true`` * ``SaveJobs = false`` * ``StorageAccessOnFind = Never`` * Make sure to carefully :ref:`read the logs <log>` in ``--verbose`` mode, especially at the startup of Orthanc. The logs may contain very important information regarding performance. * Make sure to read guides about the `tuning of PostgreSQL <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Performance_Optimization>`__. * You might also be interested in checking the options related to :ref:`security <security>`. * Consider using filesystems that are known to achieve high performance, such as `XFS <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XFS>`__ or `Btrfs <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs>`__ on GNU/Linux distributions. * On GNU/Linux distributions, `LVM (Logical Volume Manager) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_Volume_Manager_(Linux)>`__ can be used to dynamically and easily grow the storage area as more space becomes needed. * If using the :ref:`DICOMweb server plugin <dicomweb-server-config>`, consider setting configuration option ``StudiesMetadata`` to ``MainDicomTags``.