Mercurial > hg > orthanc-book
comparison Sphinx/source/faq/features.rst @ 79:b77aa0655389
note
author | Sebastien Jodogne <s.jodogne@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:53:02 +0100 |
parents | d6bd1dd820e5 |
children | 0e8b85acf3e0 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
78:d6bd1dd820e5 | 79:b77aa0655389 |
---|---|
95 attachments). Choosing between metadata and attachments is a matter of | 95 attachments). Choosing between metadata and attachments is a matter of |
96 trade-off: Metadata must be kept small (as a rule of thumb, under 1KB) | 96 trade-off: Metadata must be kept small (as a rule of thumb, under 1KB) |
97 and used if fast access is needed, whereas attachments can be used to | 97 and used if fast access is needed, whereas attachments can be used to |
98 store arbitrarily large piece of data. | 98 store arbitrarily large piece of data. |
99 | 99 |
100 Also note that metadata and attachments are only available for | |
101 resources stored inside Orthanc. Once one DICOM instance leaves the | |
102 Orthanc ecosystem, its associated metadata and attachments are lost. | |
103 | |
100 | 104 |
101 Core metadata | 105 Core metadata |
102 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | 106 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
103 | 107 |
104 Here are the main metadata handled by the Orthanc core: | 108 Here are the main metadata handled by the Orthanc core: |