Mercurial > hg > orthanc-book
comparison Sphinx/source/faq/features.rst @ 79:b77aa0655389
note
| author | Sebastien Jodogne <s.jodogne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:53:02 +0100 |
| parents | d6bd1dd820e5 |
| children | 0e8b85acf3e0 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 78:d6bd1dd820e5 | 79:b77aa0655389 |
|---|---|
| 95 attachments). Choosing between metadata and attachments is a matter of | 95 attachments). Choosing between metadata and attachments is a matter of |
| 96 trade-off: Metadata must be kept small (as a rule of thumb, under 1KB) | 96 trade-off: Metadata must be kept small (as a rule of thumb, under 1KB) |
| 97 and used if fast access is needed, whereas attachments can be used to | 97 and used if fast access is needed, whereas attachments can be used to |
| 98 store arbitrarily large piece of data. | 98 store arbitrarily large piece of data. |
| 99 | 99 |
| 100 Also note that metadata and attachments are only available for | |
| 101 resources stored inside Orthanc. Once one DICOM instance leaves the | |
| 102 Orthanc ecosystem, its associated metadata and attachments are lost. | |
| 103 | |
| 100 | 104 |
| 101 Core metadata | 105 Core metadata |
| 102 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | 106 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| 103 | 107 |
| 104 Here are the main metadata handled by the Orthanc core: | 108 Here are the main metadata handled by the Orthanc core: |