Mercurial > hg > orthanc-book
comparison Sphinx/source/faq/troubleshooting.rst @ 188:60c91045bf2a
cont
author | Sebastien Jodogne <s.jodogne@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:13:52 +0100 |
parents | a846a8f6d9a6 |
children | 99ba212989cc |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
187:0fa1cf88c635 | 188:60c91045bf2a |
---|---|
74 this end, you can notably check out the :ref:`official PostgreSQL | 74 this end, you can notably check out the :ref:`official PostgreSQL |
75 plugin <postgresql>`. | 75 plugin <postgresql>`. |
76 | 76 |
77 As a rule of thumb, the performance of the default SQLite engine | 77 As a rule of thumb, the performance of the default SQLite engine |
78 built in Orthanc should run fine up to about 50,000 DICOM instances. | 78 built in Orthanc should run fine up to about 50,000 DICOM instances. |
79 However, we have seen Orthanc running fairly well with more than 2 | |
80 millions of instances. This limit really depends upon your | |
81 application, and upon the patterns of access to the database. | |
82 | |
79 Also check out the section about the :ref:`scalability`. | 83 Also check out the section about the :ref:`scalability`. |
80 | 84 |
81 | 85 |
82 * **Orthanc Explorer is slow under Windows on the localhost**: | 86 * **Orthanc Explorer is slow under Windows on the localhost**: |
83 | 87 |