Created on 2016-06-09.00:00:07 by admin, last changed by admin.
| Messages | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg60 (view) | Author: admin | Date: 2016-06-09.00:00:07 | |
[BitBucket user: Richard Miller-Smith] [BitBucket date: 2016-06-08.22:00:07] We occasionally create studies that have a patient name but no associated PatientID. These all seem to transfer fine, but are not listed by the explorer. Is it possible they can be added? |
|||
| msg61 (view) | Author: admin | Date: 2016-06-09.09:06:51 | |
[BitBucket user: Sébastien Jodogne] [BitBucket date: 2016-06-09.07:06:51] In Orthanc Explorer, the patients whose PatientID tag is empty are all grouped together as a single patient (cf. https://orthanc.chu.ulg.ac.be/book/faq/orthanc-ids.html). If you open this "pseudo-patient", the individual studies corresponding to all the original patients will show up. This is because Orthanc Explorer is designed as a low-level, administrative user interface. In particular, Orthanc Explorer only supports the patient-study-series-instance access scheme, not the study-series-instance scheme that you wish. If this behavior is insufficient for you, we kindly invite you to create a GUI on the top of the REST API of Orthanc (cf. https://orthanc.chu.ulg.ac.be/book/faq/improving-interface.html). |
|||
| msg62 (view) | Author: admin | Date: 2016-06-09.10:37:54 | |
[BitBucket user: Richard Miller-Smith] [BitBucket date: 2016-06-09.08:37:54] Thank you, that explains it - I hadn't spotted that all the non-ID'd studies were getting grouped like that. I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank you for Orthanc - I have found it to be an excellently designed package with great documentation. Richard |
|||
| msg63 (view) | Author: admin | Date: 2016-06-09.10:44:57 | |
[BitBucket user: Sébastien Jodogne] [BitBucket date: 2016-06-09.08:44:57] Thanks for your positive feedback! ;) |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2026-07-29 15:51:18 | admin | create | |